The black male socialist has the popular vote but he's a rascist and if he gets the nod, the dems won't win the oval office.  The party could use it's "super-delegates" to give the nomination to the white female socialist but she lies a lot and if she gets the nod, the dems won't win the oval office.  Internally, their party would implode.  Can you imagine what would happen if the party took the nomination away from the black male socialist, who rightfully won it, and then gave it to the white female socialist?  The charges of rascism and discrimination that'd be leveled on the party would be huge.  The party knows this is where it's headed so they're considering entering a white male socialist into the mix.  The white male socialist is rascist and lies a lot too but he won an Oscar and Nobel Prize for it so they're thinking he could be a safe bet :

Senior Democrats mull Al Gore's nomination

By Tim Shipman in Washington
Last Updated: 2:23am BST 30/03/2008

Plans for Al Gore to take the Democratic presidential nomination as the saviour of a bitterly divided party are being actively discussed by senior figures and aides to the former vice-president.

The bloody civil war between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama has left many Democrats convinced that neither can deliver a knockout blow to the other and that both have been so damaged that they risk losing November's election to the Republican nominee, John McCain.

Former Gore aides now believe he could emerge as a compromise candidate acceptable to both camps at the party's convention in Denver during the last week of August.

Two former Gore campaign officials have told The Sunday Telegraph that a scenario first mapped out by members of Mr Gore's inner circle last May now has a sporting chance of coming true.

Mr Gore, who was Bill Clinton's vice-president and has since won a Nobel Peace Prize and an Oscar for his work on green issues, remains an influential figure eight years after he beat George W Bush in the popular vote but lost the White House after the Florida recount fiasco.

The opening has emerged because opinion polls show Mr McCain stretching his lead over both Mr Obama and Mrs Clinton, whose campaigns are engaged in a daily cycle of attacks, character assassination and mutual recriminations on religion, race and the economy.

This would be funny if it weren't so sad... 

Comments (2)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

...
written by Ron Good, March 31, 2008

Actually my take on it is that if/once the Democrats decide at a convention that Hillary is out of it, Obama can and will win.

That doesn't cheer me up, but that's how I see it. McCain is a respectable human being, but I don't think enough Republicans and undecideds will see him as sufficiently "not Bush-like" to win an election; he's still solidly old regime.

Sadly as well, the first black presidential candidate probably should have been Colin Powell, regardless of party.

...
written by Brian, March 31, 2008

I heard this one before and it confuses me. After two years of "we're going to break the mold and historic campaign" talk in which either a woman or a black man will "historically" be a presidential nominee, and their going to just hand it over to the white guy?

If Obama somehow, anyhow doesn't get the nomination, the Dems implode. The black voters, who they have courted for so many years and make up such a large part of the party, will react in anger and abandon the party - and deservedly so.

Name

Email

Website

Title

Comment

Add Comment