The Tribunal ruled that Christian Horizons could not require its employees to sign the Statement. It found that Christian Horizons is primarily engaged in serving the disability-related needs of its clients, and the prohibition on homosexual relationships was not a legitimate job requirement for providing quality care and support to disabled residents.In addition to awarding Ms. Heintz lost wages, general damages and damages for mental anguish, the decision sets out that Christian Horizons will: no longer require employees to sign a lifestyle and morality statement; develop anti-discrimination policies; provide training to all employees and managers; and review all of its employment policies to ensure that they are in compliance with the Code. “This decision is important,” commented Chief Commissioner Barbara Hall, “because it sets out that when faith-based and other organizations move beyond serving the interests of their particular community to serving the general public, the rights of others, including employees, must be respected.”

http://steynian.wordpress.com/barbara-hall-rules-on-employee-lifestyle-and-morality-statement/

Meanwhile back in reality Mississauga, to kick Muslims out of pools Christians want to use or something.

And no HRC will rule that affirmative action or hiring quotas against whites are bad.

Human rights for thee but happily, not for me,

Canuckistan! Where I'm happy to have less rights than anyone else,... Well some are.

Well Human rights commissions are happy with racism because good racism, prevents bad racism. See racism against me is good. Against citizens of a higher Canadian caste it's bad.

Comments (0)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

Name

Email

Website

Title

Comment

Add Comment