We are all Canadian Cynic.

It's interesting to see how some are so quick to hitch their wagons to the CC pony...Birds of a feather I guess...

No sweat there Richard, I'm sure Douglas Friesen doesn't have the money to drag your arse into court for the damage you have done to his reputation.

Don't you think it would be smarter for him to go after whoever set up the realcdncynic site than to go after a blogger who merely asked about the validity of the information contained on the realcdncynic site? Would that not make more sense?

Seems pretty irresponsible to post this sort of information if you can't substantiate your speculations.

See, you're still confused. I put this post up asking about the veracity of the information contained in someone elses post on someone else's site. If you have a problem with the posting of that original information on that other site, perhaps you should contact that site's owner. If you have a problem with me trying to validate said information then, well, I guess you need to up your meds... Seeking truth is never irresponsible...

Maybe you should go back to stalking Werner Patels.

You know, someone suggested that Werner may be behind the realcdncynic site and that this is a set-up as some sort or retaliation for the spanking I gave him last week (see post below this one)... It's plausible I guess but I don't think he's bright enough...

look: you put up this info, without any substantiation, in speculation of cc's id, right? let's review: "Is it legit? Does anyone know anything about this?" see? unsubstatiated. rt noted that your behavior wrt your unsubstantiated speculation "seems pretty irresponsible", and your counter-argument amounts to "it's unsubstantiated speculation! what part about that do you not get??

You're assuming/projecting the whole "speculation" part KEVron. I didn't comment on the information at all beyond asking if it's factual.

I posted the information that came to me in an e-mail. I linked to the site that was referenced in that e-mail. I quoted from the referenced site. I asked whether or not it was accurate. That is all. No more, no less.

Upon further review and examination(heh heh) I've concluded that it can't be Canadian Cesspool(who is not Dougie) as that Peacework outfit has Christian clients and we all know how Cessy(who is not Dougie) feels about Christians and such...lol!

Are dollars paid by Christians different than those paid by atheists? I'm not speculating here, mind you, I'm just askin' the question...

how're you going to authenticate?

That's not up to me. That's up to the individual supplying the information.

if your unwashed few don't supply the support, are you gonna go ahead and pay realcd his bounty, seeing as you can't disprove him?

I'm not paying a single cent without verification. That was the deal I offered.

how much evidence before you finally pay up? you know, it's not called "virtual reality" for nothing, jughead.

I know what I need to see and so far I haven't.

Nah but Good Lord and of course I'm speaking hypothetically if and say "if" the clients were liberal atheists and the person(who's name isn't Dougie) looking after their business was an insane/profane Christian conservative why I don't think the liberal atheists would be none too happy...just saying...lol.

That would be a good reason to remain anonymous at all costs no?

ps: KEVron, you can log the above comment as speculation if you'd like...

KEVron just screwed it for the rest of you. Comment moderation is turned on unless you're a registered member...

C'mon now, what did you expect from the pipsqueak lol kevron?...you realize he is the captain of the Canadian Cesspool dive team but his energetic defence of Canadian Cesspool(who isn't Dougie) is rather interesting...are we done here, yeah, I guess we're done here.

From KEVron I wouldn't expect anything better I guess...

Maybe during his banishment Kevron can ponder the reason behind CC's lack of refutation of realcdncynic's claims...

Seems pretty irresponsible to post this sort of information if you can't substantiate your speculations.

Unfortunately you're the rule instead of the exception when it comes to CC's friends. Let me explain this again. Very, very slowly:

I-did-not-post-this-information. I-was-notified-that-the-information-was-posted-and-questioned-it's-validity. At-no-point-in-my-post-did-I-speculate-on-the-given-information. I-did-speculate-however-on-the-value-of-Christian-dollars-vs-atheist-dollars.

Do you understand that yet you mental fucking midget?

Please do us all a favor: Go back to your dear leader and tell him that if he's going to send someone over to make sure that the messenger has some brains. You freakin idiots are wasting both my time and my bandwidth!

Well, then, Richard, what do you think? Are you brave enough to actually state whether you think Doug Friesen is the Canadian Cynic, or not?

No hiding behind "just-posting-what-was-sent", now. Answer the question: what do you think?

What do I think? Well, M@, I think you're a moron. Having said that though, you still seem way smarter than KEVron.

As far as the CC/Doug thing goes, I don't have enough information to make a determination either way. Hence my question, in regards to the validity of the information, contained on the realcdncynic site. I don't know how things work in your world but here, in the real world, it's irresponsible to either dismiss or accept such information without first asking a few questions.