Are you an endophobic bigot? Red Tory knows what it means, do you?
Many times I’ve been called xenophobic and it’s funny how when you go to a thesaurus or dictionary there is no opposite of the word. It’s funny because there is a word thats very fitting but no one uses, there is an opposite you have an exoskeleton or an endoskeleton.
For those of you who never took biology you have an endo skeleton “within” and crabs spiders etc have exoskeletons. ie their skeleton is on the outside.
Hence endophobic someone who doesn’t like people like themselves very much and is willing to treat others better. The bigot part you can look up on your own, but it must be genetic because every white male is one so intolerant Universities have started teaching.
Did I just coin a phrase? Possibly, however I seem to want to use it a lot of late and wanted to put my rationale in the open for when said bigots read this. Now would you treat people different than you, better than people like you? Would you have an aversion for one and a preference for the other like socialists seem too.
Someone who will bring people to my country and support giving them preferential hiring, force changes on my country to accommodate them, give biased media coverage of them, give them government programs the rest of us don’t get, build them cultural centers out of tax dollars, not allow people who built the country to speak ill of them, etc, is an endophobic bigot.
From oed.com
Endo
(before a vowel sometimes reduced to end-), employed as comb. form of Gr.
http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50074986?
phobic
Forming adjectives with the sense ‘that has a fear of’, ‘that has an aversion to’, ‘that has no affinity for 
’
Bigot, look it up on your own eh
Well, perhaps in some respects, the shoe fits. I do happen to prefer many characteristics of other countries and cultures to those of my own two native lands. In my whacky moonbat world, this is simply referred to as being “cosmopolitan” and “eclectic” — that however doesn’t in any way preclude the fact that I’m deeply attached to my heritage and reasonably proud of being a Brit and a Canadian.
In fact he’s so proud of being a Canadian that he proposes a policy to totally change the demography of the country and by denying jobs whites will have fewer children so that in 100 years looking back at our heritage people will have no idea what Canada was like pre trudeaupia when 96% of the country was of European stock. But we have so much pride that they need to be replaced to show our pride in our culture.
It’s like cleaning weeds out of the garden because you like weeds or something, I don’t “get” it but I know what to call it.
Endophobic Bigotry.
You continue to LIE. I never proposed any of the things you attribute to me (denying jobs to whites, etc.) Those allegations are entirely your own fabrications.
Red Tory, who is in fact a Red Liberal, wrote many posts supporting affirmative action on his old blog, but he deleted them out of shame.
Red Liberal once proclaimed on his blog that Canada is a “racist backwater”.
According to Alexa Red Liberal is the third most ridiculed blogger in Canada after WK and Cherniak. Chin up, Red! You can make it to number 1! Go, Red, go!
Red Liberal once proclaimed on his blog that Canada is a “racist backwater”.
Because we support affirmative action? Or hiring freezes of white males?
Well for someone accusing me of lying please, please, please, help me set the record straight, RT because I really don’t know where you stand either you are or are not pregnant.
In case RT missed the last post, I think your above correlated with b which I said and you called me a liar. Call me confused.
Well which is it RT either you think the liberals cutting off hiring and bringing in a quarter of a million new Canadians a year while us obsolete types languish with over a million unemployed is
A: “good”
which I said then got called a liar.
or
B: “Bad”
denying jobs to whites, etc.) Those allegations are entirely your own fabrications.
I might buy that except when I said,
Which I said then got called a liar??? WTF,
Please say one of the above is true because I don’t see how it’s possible for them both to be lies. Or do you just not want your opinion known. Hows the back?
Stigmatizing labels are always pinned on anyone who disagrees with a dogmatic leftist…it’s tediously predictable…they name call because they lack the intellectual and ethical capacity to formulate reasoned civil counter argument to defend their errant dogma.
so what else is new Richard